QPR fans on Twitter quickly called the fashion police after striker Sebastian ‘Little Red Riding Hood’ Polter posted a picture of himself ahead of a trip to Barcelona.Polter jetted off for a well deserved break after helping Rangers win at Fulham in a dramatic west London derby.Massive three points today. 🙌🏼 Now off to Barcelona for a short holiday! 😎👍🏼 #COYRS #SeeYouSoon pic.twitter.com/X9CV7Jj00g— Sebastian Polter (@polti1991) October 1, 2016@polti1991 well done bud but wtf are you wearing??!! 😎😂— Stuart Stamp (@stuart_stamp) October 1, 2016@polti1991 buy some new clothes whilst in Barca PLEASE— Neil Southey (@kblockpoole) October 1, 2016@polti1991 that’s the sort of outfit only a professional footballer or a pimp would get away with wearing 🙈— sean flood (@floody_s) October 1, 2016@polti1991 you ain’t pulling much in that outfit sunshine ⚪️🔵⚪️🔵— Wayne Reese (@reesie75) October 1, 2016@polti1991 Well deserved Polti – but don’t let the bulls see you in that!— Grant Foster (@Beanofire) October 1, 2016@polti1991 if anyone asks what you do, please don’t say you play for #QPR it’s enough of a circus without you dressing like a clown— PhilG67 (@W12Squirrel) October 1, 2016@polti1991 have a great time Seb but what the bloody hell are you wearing 😂— steve allen (@steveallen82) October 1, 2016@polti1991 he wears wot he wants, he wears wot he wants! We’re Queen’s Park rangers he wears wot he wants #QPR #FULQPR— TonyC (@TCQPR2012) October 1, 2016@polti1991 mate,ONLY you can get away with that outfit !👍🔵⚪️— Tony Salvatore (@WI2TPS) October 1, 2016@polti1991 if you hear sirens; it’s the fashion police— Loftboy (@ianpyke1) October 2, 2016@polti1991 look like a big salami— Loftus Roads (@4EverQPR) October 1, 2016@polti1991 Nice one Seb. But seriously, that outfit is proper rascal!— Simon Hunter (@realsimonhunter) October 1, 2016@polti1991 camouflage clobber will blend in nicely…German Ninja stylee— Skorpio (@Skorpio1) October 1, 2016@polti1991 mate you look like a hot dog— jake claremont (@hoopsmanjake) October 1, 2016@polti1991 mate, that outfit’s funnier than a last-minute Fulham penalty! Enjoy Barca!— Kieran Robinson ⚽ (@Son_of_Robin) October 1, 2016@polti1991 WTF Seb is that outfit?You going fancy dress or going to be one of the guys on La Ramblas taking pictures with the tourists?😂— neil flynn (@neilflynn61) October 1, 2016 Ads by Revcontent Trending Articles Urologists: Men, Forget the Blue Pill! This “Destroys” ED x ‘Genius Pill’ Used By Rich Americans Now Available In Netherlands! x One Cup of This (Before Bed) Burns Belly Fat Like Crazy! x Men, You Don’t Need the Blue Pill if You Do This x What She Did to Lose Weight Stuns Doctors: Do This Daily Before Bed! x Drink This Before Bed, Watch Your Body Fat Melt Like Crazy x Follow West London Sport on TwitterFind us on Facebook
Long story short, we’re putting this week’s NFL picks out as an appetizer for next week’s Thanksgiving feast:Jets 20, Raiders 19: Derek Carr lost his 2014 rookie debut at the Jets, and, 88 games later, he surprisingly falls in his return visit. Line: Line: Jets +349ers 33, Packers 20: Neither Aaron Rodgers nor Aaron Jones can stop the 49ers defense from grading out A+. Line: 49ers -3Texans 33, Colts 24: Houston has yet to lose back-to-back games, and this is a welcome homecoming after …
As if reprimanding simpletons, three scientists writing in Science1 preached that the old picture of evolution from simple to complex is simplistic. This is particularly true, they claim, for the story that eukaryotes were born from a blessed union. “Data from many sources,” they counter, “give no direct evidence that eukaryotes evolved by genome fusion between archaea and bacteria.” Further down, they remark, “Unfortunately, such a model has been tacitly favored by molecular biologists who appeared to view evolution as an irreversible march from simple prokaryotes to complex eukaryotes, from unicellular to multicellular.” The old picture harks back to obsolete views of straight-line evolution.Comparative genomics and proteomics have strengthened the view that modern eukaryote and prokaryote cells have long followed separate evolutionary trajectories. Because their cells appear simpler, prokaryotes have traditionally been considered ancestors of eukaryotes. Nevertheless, comparative genomics has confirmed a lesson from paleontology: Evolution does not proceed monotonically from the simpler to the more complex. Here, we review recent data from proteomics and genome sequences suggesting that eukaryotes are a unique primordial lineage….Out with the old, in with the new. What do they suggest to replace the old picture? Believe it or not, “sequence loss and cellular simplification.” Since these are “are common modes of evolution,” they argue that the first eukaryote was already a unique, complex creature. Like a predator or raptor, it acquired mitochondria by phagocytosis, and diversified from there. Their view does not prohibit increases in complexity, yet they seem eager to distance evolutionary theory from visions of progress. “Genome evolution is a two-way street,” they say; “This bidirectional sense of reversibility is important as an alternative to the view of evolution as a rigidly monotonic progression from simple to more complex states, a view with roots in the 18th-century theory of orthogenesis.” They describe several life-forms that have reduced their genomes and slimmed down to the bare minimum: parasites, symbionts, organelle genomes, and anaerobes. OK so far; evolution can move either toward complex or simple – but how does this explain eukaryotes (cells with nuclei and compartmentalized organelles)? Here, their explanation appears forced by the hard realities of the evidence. From the earliest possible ancestor, eukaryotes were already complex. They had introns (and complex spliceosomes, half of whose 78 proteins are unique to eukaryotes, to handle them), mitosomes, hydrogenosomes, mitochondria, nuclei, nucleoli, the Golgi apparatus, centrioles, and an endoplasmic reticulum, along with “hundreds of proteins with no orthologs evident in the genomes of prokaryotes.” (Simple Giardia, for example, has 347 eukaryote signature proteins.) Much of the article describes the unprecedented features of eukaryotes, which constitute a “unique cell type that cannot be deconstructed into features inherited directly from archaea and bacteria.” This calls for alternatives to “hypotheses that attribute eukaryote origins to genome fusion between archaea and bacteria” (endosymbiosis), which they claim “are surprisingly uninformative about the emergence of the cellular and genomic signatures of eukaryotes.” Recognition of these realities must be “the critical starting point” for explaining where eukaryotes came from: i.e., a “larger and more complex cell” at the beginning when the three kingdoms – bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes – diverged. Their picture can be summarized as follows: (1) the common ancestor was a raptor or predator on prokaryote mitochondria. (2) Cellular crowding and compartmentalization led to more efficient molecular interactions. (3) Extensive genome reduction followed. Darwin, of course, grins in the background; “This abbreviated account of genome reduction illustrates the Darwinian view of evolution as a reversible process in the sense that ‘eyes can be acquired and eyes can be lost’” (because of the two-way street of natural selection). Even Darwin would have agreed that “selection gives, and selection takes.” They concur with essential evolutionary doctrine without hesitation: “Genomes evolve continuously through the interplay of unceasing mutation, unremitting competition, and ever-changing environments.” Darwinism is safe, therefore; so now, let’s picture the new emerging story for the 21st century:For the reasons outlined above, we favor the idea that the host that acquired the mitochondrial endosymbiont [sic] was a unicellular eukaryote predator, a raptor. The emergence [sic] of unicellular raptors would have had a major ecological impact on the evolution of the gentler descendants of the common ancestor. These may have responded with several adaptive strategies: They might outproduce the raptors by rapid growth or hide from raptors by adapting to extreme environments. Thus, the hypothetical eukaryote raptors may have driven the evolution of their autotrophic, heterotrophic, and saprotrophic cousins in a reductive mode that put a premium on the relatively fast-growing, streamlined cell types we call prokaryotes.One problem. How this complex, predatory cell with most of its unique parts “emerged” is anyone’s guess. So get busy, everyone: “This scenario, which is not contradicted by new data derived from comparative genomics and proteomics, is a suitable starting point [sic] for future work.”1Kurland, Collins and Penny, “Genomics and the Irreducible Nature of Eukaryote Cells,” Science, 19 May 2006: Vol. 312. no. 5776, pp. 1011 – 1014, DOI: 10.1126/science.1121674.How many more times can Darwinism survive the onslaught of facts? Here is another case where (1) everything you know is wrong, (2) the old ideas taught in the days of the Scopes Trial and as far back as Darwin were too simplistic, (3) the complexity appears to have been present from the start, and (4) nobody has a clue what happened, and (5) all we have is a “suitable starting point” (read: hunch, guess, scenario, plot, tall tale) for starting all over. Once again, also, it will be harder this time because the “new data derived from comparative genomics and proteomics” complicates the picture enormously. In place of the old simple story (that was easy to illustrate in textbook cartoons), we have a new, more violent tale. Predator cells pop into existence somehow, fully equipped; they alter the ecology and force the prokaryote prey to streamline their genomes and hide. Established at the top of the food chain, these new eukaryotes begin their long trek toward Volvox, Tiktaalik and Homo sapiens. Whenever needed, these storytellers can always invoke the Darwinist Miracle Word emergence to cover their tracks, and call in Tinker Bell to wave the mutation wand when a major innovation is needed. Thus is worship in the Temple of Charlie kept going another day, while Big Science mans the fortifications. But for how much longer? The Visigoths are at the gates (05/09/2006), demanding, “Enough of this! No more excuses. Mr. Darwin, tear down this wall!”(Visited 70 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
Tayyab Ali, 92, lies on a rusty cot in a large house with a courtyard full of plants. Clad in an off-white kurta, he peers intently through thick glasses as he says, “I moved here in 1946 to protect our heritage. I am still doing the same thing.”Tayyab Ali Bengali, as he likes to be called, had migrated from what is now Bangladesh. He was one of the 313 Ahmadiyyas who, at the time of the Partition, had chosen to stay back in Qadian in Punjab’s Gurdaspur district. It was here that the sect’s founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, had established a religious community in 1889. The Ahmadiyyas believe that their founder was the “promised messiah” of the Muslims, meant to propagate the teachings of Prophet Mohammad. But the majority Sunni Muslims believe the Prophet to be the last messiah. This fundamental difference in religious belief has meant that the Ahmadiyyas are a persecuted minority in every Islamic state.In Pakistan, where over 4 million Ahmadiyyas reside, an ordinance passed by the government in 1984 declared them as “non-Muslims”. It also made it a criminal offence for members of this community to practise Islam or claim to be Muslims.As for the Ahmadiyyas, they call themselves a “revival movement in Islam”, one that rejects “terrorism” and believes in the “jihad of the pen” as opposed to a “jihad of the sword”.Mr. Ali is proud to be a ‘Darvesh’, the title given to each of the 313 who chose to stay in India after the 1947 Partition, leaving their families in Pakistan. He recalls attending a few sermons given by Ahmadiyya leaders in 1945, after which he decided to join the sect. He moved to Qadian the following year.“My parents were Sunnis. They stopped me but I didn’t listen to them. After Partition, my father sent me a money order and asked me to come back. But I sent the money order back,” he says. He last travelled to see his family over 50 years ago, in what was then East Pakistan, but returned in four days. “The environment was hostile. My parents didn’t treat me well. I came back,” he recalls. In India, he says, he wakes up for fajr, the first of the five prayers through the day, rests, eats, and goes to watch kids play football in the evening.The only tough time, he recalls, was the year following Partition. “We lived like prisoners, with a bare minimum of food, for over a year. We couldn’t get out of Qadian. A year later, I started playing football and volleyball, and that became a reason for me to get out of Qadian sometimes for tournaments,” Mr. Ali says.India’s Ahmadiyya population is about 1.5 lakh, About 6,000 of them live in Qadian in a settlement spread across 1,500 acres. It has a residential colony, two mosques, State board-affiliated schools for both girls and boys, a religious college, a few manufacturing units, including a chapatti-making unit, playgrounds, community halls, and religious monuments.Self-sustaining communityModelled as a self-sustaining township of sorts, the community enjoys its own administration, known as the ‘Secretariat’, with separate departments for expenditure, construction, audit, general affairs, information technology, waseehat and jaidaat. All the department heads are appointed by the ‘Khalifa’, or fifth successor of the founder, Mirza Masroor Ahmad. The Khalifa is based in London, which has now become the headquarters of the community.“Most of the money to run the community comes from donations by our members across the country. A significant part of it is generated by a system wherein those who pledge allegiance to the community donate 10% of their property and monthly salary to the administration,” says Ahmadiyya Muslim Jamaat’s (AMJ) spokesperson Tariq Ahmed. Many members of the community live in houses owned by the sect, pay a nominal rent, and work at the Secretariat.Nasir Waheed, who handles accounts at the Secretariat, says that he gets a salary of just ₹7,000 a month but is grateful for the peaceful life. “My children study in the community school where the fees are low. And because I work for the community, there are a lot of benefits,” he says, adding that his father was a Darvesh. “He worked for free in the initial years and started with a salary of ₹5”.Mr. Waheed’s wife, Swalehah Waheed (37), says the women are mostly occupied in religious programmes scheduled through the year. The entire settlement is divided into 13 sub-areas, each headed by a woman who is responsible for the ‘religious guidance’ of the women of her subdivision. “They give us books of our Khalifa to read and there are regular discussions around it. Every now and then, religious programmes are organised where women and minor girls share what they have read,” says Ms. Waheed, who has a master’s degree in political science from Panjab University.While there are many like Ms. Waheed, there are also women like Tahira Maqbool. Ms. Maqbool is now an Indian citizen but was a Pakistani until two years ago. The 34-year-old mother of three recalls life back “home” in Faisalabad and the pain of living there.‘Home’ truths “I was born in Faisalabad and stayed there till I got married in 2003. It’ll always be home because I’ve spent my childhood there. But in Pakistan we are treated worse than animals,” she says. Recalling an incident, she describes how her brother was once stopped on the street for particular reason, slapped around, and asked to change his faith.Tehmida (29), also a Pakistani born and brought up in Karachi, got married in India in 2013. She, too, has experienced persecution. “I was a bright student in college and my teachers loved me. But the day they came to know that I was an Ahmadiyya, their attitude towards me changed completely. They even asked me to leave the college. I said I’ll only leave if you make a formal complaint.”Unfortunately, for the married Pakistani women in Qadian, the ordeal doesn’t end even after they leave their home country. In India, life without citizenship is not easy either.“Sometimes, I feel like a prisoner because I have to renew my visa every year. I got married here and my four-year-old son is also an Indian. But I can’t leave Qadian. To travel out of this town, I need a No Objection Certificate from the Indian government. This remains a huge problem,” says Ms. Tehmida, adding that her friends from Pakistan often ask her if she has visited Mumbai or the Taj Mahal. “What could I say?”Slow citizenship process Tears roll down the eyes of Ms. Maqbool as she recalls the time her father passed away, in April 2012. She could not go and see him one last time as she had submitted her passport to the Indian government as part of her citizenship application process. “It is a very slow process,” she says. “I received the citizenship certificate only in April 2016.” Rukaiyya Khalam (52), from Pakistan’s Rabwah, has a similar story. She came to India in 1994 and started her citizenship process right then. “My mother passed away in 1996. But there is a requirement that in order to get citizenship, I should not leave India for seven years after I come here. So I didn’t go. Now, more than 20 years later, I am still not an Indian national,” she says.Ms. Tehmida, however, is happy in one respect. “I am free to practise my beliefs the way I want”.Mr. Ahmed, too, dwells on the relief in being able to freely call oneself a Muslim.In September, the Pakistani government had removed Princeton economist Atif Mian, an Ahmadiyya, from the newly set up Economic Advisory Council because of opposition from the Sunni majority. “In Pakistan, we can’t keep the Koran. We can’t celebrate Id. We can’t publish any of our books or periodicals. We can’t greet with Assalamu alaikum. There is not a single month when our people are not martyred. How would they accept one of us in the national Economic Advisory Council? India and most of the 211 other countries where our people live are extremely tolerant in this matter as compared to Pakistan,” he says.Members of the community say that they can lead a normal life In India, like any other Muslim, so long as they don’t show that they’re Ahmadiyya. Mansoor Ahmad, a local who often visits his relatives in Delhi, says that his nieces and nephews go to a private college and none of their friends really care what community they are from. “But it’s not always like this. There have been instances when hardliners in Ludhiana have created a ruckus because of our presence during religious programmes. But even on those occasions things never escalated to violence,” he says.
State Rep. Jim Lower voted along with a majority of his colleagues in the Michigan House of Representatives on Wednesday to approve legislation giving legal gun owners back their fundamental right to bear arms without a government-issued permit.Lower, of Cedar Lake, co-sponsored the four-bill package, which removes the penalties for carrying a concealed handgun without first obtaining a concealed pistol license.“Under current law, gun owners can open carry without a permit. To force law-abiding citizens to pay a fee and take a class in order to wear a coat is ridiculous. These bills simply correct this inequity,” Lower said. “People who can legally own guns shouldn’t be forced to navigate government bureaucracy and buy a license before exercising their fundamental right to bear arms for their personal protection. I’m proud to support this simple, common-sense plan that gives lawful people back the freedom they deserve.”Lower stressed the legislation would not give criminals more access to guns. The requirement that a person get a background check to purchase a handgun will remain in place, and any person currently barred from purchasing a firearm law would continue to be prohibited from carrying a gun.Under the plan, the current concealed pistol license permitting structure will remain in place to allow Michigan residents an option to obtain a CPL to continue to carry and receive reciprocity in states that recognize Michigan’s permit. A CPL will also continue to allow people to carry openly in certain restricted zones.House Bills 4416-19 now move to the Senate for consideration.### Categories: Lower News 08Jun House approves ‘right to carry’ legislation co-sponsored by Lower
State Rep. Shane Hernandez – chair of the Michigan House Appropriations Committee – tonight said the state’s continued success depends on providing taxpayers with the best possible return on their investments.“We must continue building Michigan’s momentum the right way – spending taxpayer dollars as efficiently and effectively as possible on roads, schools and other essential services our state needs to thrive,” Hernandez, of Port Huron, said after Gov. Gretchen Whitmer delivered the State of the State address. “It’s not just about more money. It’s about wisely using what we already have to deliver the results taxpayers deserve and demand.“I will be focused on making state government better – not bigger,” Hernandez said. “I look forward to working with the governor and Legislature in the coming months to craft a state budget that works for all Michigan residents, including our hard-working taxpayers.” ### Categories: Hernandez News,News 12Feb Rep. Hernandez on State of the State: Delivering results for Michigan taxpayers is key to success
Telecom Italia (TIM) has named Pietro Scott Jovane as chief commercial officer.Pietro Scott JovaneJovane, who holds US, UK and Italian citizenship, will join TIM in mid-April, and will report to CEO Amos Genish. He previously worked as group controller for Seat Pagine Gialle, CEO of Microsoft Italia, CEO of publishing outfit RCS Mediagroup and, more recently, CEO for Italian e-commerce outfit ePrice, formerly known as Banzai.At TIM, he will be charged with developing the company’s commercial strategy focusing in particular on the consumer and small enterprise business, top clients – and the multimedia entertainment business.He has been tasked with speeding up TIM’s convergence of content and distribution platforms, and will also be responsible for activities relating to brand development and positioning.
Council staff Stephanie Roulston and Catherine Morris, handing out ‘Older Person’s General Home Safety’ leaflets, to Eileen McNally and Charlie and Kathleen Gillespie, at the Mayor’s monthly ’tea-dance’ in the Guildhall.THOSE who attended this week’s Mayor’s Tea Dance in the Guildhall were able to avail of free home safety advice from members of Derry City and Strabane District Council’s Health and Community Wellbeing Team. Home Safety Officers hosted a stall at the event in the Guildhall where they imparted free advice, promoted their home safety message and referred people for a home visit from the team.Further information on home safety is available by contacting Council’s Home Safety Team on 028 71 253 253. COMMUNITY AND HEALTH WELLBEING TEAMCOUNCIL’S HOME SAFETY OFFICERS PROVIDE FREE ADVICE AT MAYOR’S TEA DANCETHE GUILDHALL COUNCIL’S HOME SAFETY OFFICERS PROVIDE FREE ADVICE AT MAYOR’S TEA DANCE was last modified: February 8th, 2018 by John2John2 Tags: ShareTweet