Birdwatching poised to take flight in Colombia, study reveals

first_imgA new study identifies 67 communities with high potential for developing birdwatching ecotourism in Colombia.The country is home to more than 1,900 bird species, including 443 rare birds ‘highly valued by bird watchers.’The authors present ecotourism as an alternative to mining and logging as rural communities look for ways to develop economically after a decades-long conflict. Colombia is home to more bird species than any other country on Earth. It’s also well-known for a long-simmering conflict that has only recently begun to cool. Now, a pair of scientists based in Switzerland has mapped out the possibilities for birdwatching ecotourism to bolster economic development and safeguard forests as the country emerges from decades of strife.In Colombia, “The bird diversity is seemingly endless and birds come in waves of gaudy colors,” said R. Scott Winton, an ecologist at the Swiss Federal Institute Zurich, in an email to Mongabay. “Each new site visited brings a new set of species.”A club-winged manakin (Machaeropterus deliciosus) in Colombia. Photo by Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela.A recent peace agreement between the government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia in 2016 means that many spots in the country, once off-limits due to the presence of armed groups, are now open to visitors. In a study published today in the journal Tropical Conservation Science, Winton and fellow ecologist Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela identified the locations where rare birds — the ones that birders often seek out — hang out in Colombia using known ranges and a citizen science database called eBird. They then looked for overlap with communities that are trying to develop after the conflict.Their analysis revealed 67 spots where birdwatching could be successful.Colombian municipalities (black outlines) formerly affected by the conflict with high unrealized bird-watching potential. Protected areas and established eBird hotspots overlapping with these municipalities are highlighted in purple and by black points, respectively. Background gradient shows concentrations of endemic, near-endemic, small-ranged, and threatened birds. Image and caption courtesy of Ocampo-Peñuela and Winton, 2017.“The fact that many places had remained inaccessible for 50 years means that discovery still awaits,” said Ocampo-Peñuela, also of the Swiss Federal Institute Zurich. “With peace, birders will flock to Colombia.”In large part, so many bird species — 1,942 to be exact, including 74 found nowhere else on Earth — reside in Colombia because of the country’s unique and striking geography.“Colombia has a privileged location,” she said. Unlike any other Andean country, the mountain range splits into three separate spines through the country, known as “cordilleras,” creating unique habitats that stretch from high plateaus, or “paramos,” down to rivers in the valleys below.“Each slope of each cordillera has unique birds, as well as its valleys and paramos,” she said.That translates into “a ridiculous number of ecosystems for birds to fill,” Winton added.A yellow-headed manakin (Xenopipo flavicapilla). Photo by Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela.Many of those ecosystems are still intact largely because of the conflict that Colombia has endured for so long.“Conflict in Colombia has resulted in the conservation of large tracts of pristine forests because these were protected by the armed groups as the hiding place for them and their illegal crops,” Ocampo-Peñuela said.Until now, fighting between government and FARC forces has kept loggers, ranchers and miners interests at bay. But now that these areas are once again accessible by outsiders, many conservationists are concerned about what will happen next.“In such an important transition for Colombia, we fear that extractive industries, and the hope to make quick cash, will lead to the destruction of many important habitats,” Ocampo-Peñuela said.She and Winton contend that the development of ecotourism, centered on birdwatching, will help to ensure the preservation of these habitats since the birds won’t stick around if they’re destroyed. What’s more, they say that ecotourism would be beneficial to local communities. The National Audubon Society says that 150,000 birdwatchers from the United States alone could visit Colombia in the next 10 years, which could create 7,500 jobs and $47 million in income.“[Extractive] industries do create rural jobs, but often in an ephemeral boom-bust manner,” Winton said. “Plus, in their wake, they leave a degraded landscape less able to deliver other public goods, such as clean water.”A multicolored tanager (Chlorochrysa nitidissima), which lives only in Colombia’s mountains. Photo by R. Scott Winton.By contrast, locals can expect higher-paying jobs to meet the needs of typically well-off birdwatchers, and income from this type of employment is more likely to stay in the community than be siphoned off by large corporations.“So even if birdwatching tourism generates a much smaller gross compared to extraction, a much higher percentage will be delivered to rural communities in most need of economic stimulus,” Winton said.That’s a powerful incentive to protect the environment, he added.“Once people realize people will pay a lot of money to see their birds, suddenly the forest has a lot more value in an intact state and the calculation of whether or not to clear it for a cattle pasture changes.”A long-tailed sylph (Aglaiocercus kingii), a hummingbird found in Colombia. Photo by R. Scott Winton.CITATIONOcampo-Peñuela, N., & Winton, R. S. (2017). Economic and Conservation Potential of Bird-Watching Tourism in Postconflict Colombia. Tropical Conservation Science, 10, 1940082917733862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917733862Banner image of birdwatchers by R. Scott Winton.FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.Follow John Cannon on Twitter: @johnccannon Amazon Biodiversity, Amazon Conservation, Amazon Logging, Amazon Mining, Animals, Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, Birding, Birds, Cattle Pasture, Cattle Ranching, Community Development, Conflict, Conservation, Deforestation, Development, Drivers Of Deforestation, Ecology, Economics, Ecotourism, Environment, Forests, Logging, Mapping, Mining, Rainforest Animals, Rainforest Conservation, Rainforest Deforestation, Rainforest Logging, Rainforest Mining, Rainforest People, Ranching, Research, Rivers, Saving The Amazon, Sustainable Development, Tourism, Tropical Forests, Tropical Rivers, Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation Article published by John Cannoncenter_img Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredlast_img read more